Alzheimers disease Essay -- Alzheimers Disease Essays

Alzheimers DiseaseAlzheimers disease is a form of dementia, a outlook overturn that seriously affects a persons ability to carry out daily activities (Shenk 14). Alzheimers is a progressive and irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroys a persons memory and ability to learn, make judgments, communicate, and accomplish daily activities. As Alzheimers progresses, individuals may also experience changes in personality and behavior, such as anxiety, suspiciousness or aggravation, as well as illusions or hallucinations. Alzheimers disease is named after a German doctor, Dr. Alois Alzheimer. In 1906, Dr. Alzheimer became aw ar of changes in the brain tissue of a woman who had died of an unusual mental illness. Dr. Alzheimer found irregular clusters and tangled bundles of fibers. Today, these plaques and tangles in the brain ar considered signs of Alzheimers (Shenk 12-14). Scientists have also found former(a) brain changes in plurality with Alzheimers. Nerve cells die in areas o f the brain that are vital to memory and other mental abilities. There also are lower levels of some of the chemicals in the brain that carry messages back and forth between nerve cells. Although many things are known about Alzheimers, there are still many things that remain a mystery, such as causes, and how to cure Alzheimers.Alzheimers disease affects the brain cells which are called nerve cells. Neurons send messages from one to another, which allows us to think, remember and speak. In each of the neurons there is a branch like structure. Some carry impulses away from neurons (afferent), and some fill impulses to the neurons (efferent). The relaying of impulses from neuron to neuron in the brain makes it possible for one to carry out physical and mental tasks. When plaques and tangles form in the brain, they disrupt the flow of messages to the neurons. This happens when people age, but with an Alzheimers patient there are many more than that disrupt, which allows them to forge t simple tasks. Plaques are abnormally sticky clusters of protein. They disrupt pathways that carry signals from neuron to neuron. Plaque is a deposit of protein mixed with fragments of dead or dying neurons found in the brains of patient who have Alzheimers. A tangle is a counterbalance of twisted nerve cell fibers found in the cell bodies of neurons in the brains of the patients who ha... ...urrently incurable, and only two drugs--tacrine (Cognex) and donepezil hydrochloride (Aricept)-- have been approved by the FDA for its treatment. Several other drugs are being prescribed more often as their benefits are demonstrated in wider testing. Nonetheless, the mainstay of treatment for a person with Alazheimers continues to be grave nursing care, providing both physical and emotional support for a person who is gradually able to do less and less for himself, and whose behavior is becoming more and more erratic. Modifications of the home to increase safety and security are often neces sary. The caregiver also needs support to prevent anger, despair, and burnout from becoming overwhelming. Becoming beaten(prenominal) with the issues likely to lie ahead, and considering the appropriate financial and legal issues early on, eject help both the patient and family cope with the difficult process of the disease. Regular health check care by a practitioner with a non-defeatist attitude toward Alzheimers is important so that illnesses such as urinary or respiratory infections can be diagnosed and treated properly, rather than being incorrectly attributed to the inevitable decline seen in Alzheimers.

Julius Ceasar Essay -- essays research papers

Character CountsWilliam Wordsworth once said that The best portion of a good mans life is his little, nameless, unremembered acts of kindness and rage (Health Communications, Inc. 213). In William Shakespeares play Julius Caesar, Marc Antony exhibits the character counts pillars respect, responsibility, and also caring. Marc Antony shows his respect when everyone was against Caesar, but he still was tolerant of the difference. He displayed responsibility when after Caesars death, and Brutuss speech, he told the people of Rome that Caesar was not ambitious, but true to Rome and then continued on to read Caesars will. Lastly, Marc Antony displays caring when he grieves from Caesars death.Marc Antony displayed respect when everyone was against Caesar, but he was tolerant of the difference. Friends am I with you all, and love you all, / Upon this hope, that you shall give me reasons / Why and wherein Caesar was dangerous(McDougal. 642). During the time when all of Rome was against Caes ar, and chaos was everyplace in Rome, Marc Antony respected the citizens opinions, and was capable of dealing peacefully with his anger, the insults, and disagreements. Even though Antony was being badgered for sticking by Caesar, he took to thought the feelings and opinions of the citizens at that time, and was able to dissertate them calmly with the people while others might have turned against Caesar. Therefore, Antony was not ...

Grapes Of Wrath :: essays research papers

During the Dust Bowl, hundreds of thousands of southerners faced many hardships, which is the basis of the novel called The Grapes of Wrath. rump Steinback wrote this fiction novel to portray the harsh conditions during the Dust Bowl. However, is the portrayal of the Dust Bowl in The Grapes of Wrath valid? When one considers the merit of this novel, one thinks, how displace Americans treat other Americans so horribly. After reviewing American History, the mistreatment of the "Okies" in The Grapes of Wrath can be concluded as being valid. After slavery, blacks were terribly handle. During the polished War, Americans were divided. During the Red Scare, Americans mistrusted other Americans. These three different periods of U.S. history display how Americans can treat fellow Americans so cruelly.&9African Americans were terribly treated after slavery. Although they were Americans just equivalent the whites, many of the whites hated them because they were different. One e xample of mistreatment of the African Americans was segregation, which was the division of local places by race. The blacks were thought to be so " unclean", and the whites were scared of them. The whites did not want the blacks to mix with the whites. Public areas such as schools were segregated so the blacks and whites went to different schools. It was like the whites cute to rid the U.S. of the blacks. In The Grapes of Wrath, the Californians wanted to rid the "dirty" Okies from California because they were afraid of them. They were afraid that the Okies would take their land. Blacks were also call downen for no just reason. Racial group such as the KKK, beat up blacks because they hated the blacks. They wanted the blacks to go away or die. In The Grapes of Wrath, Okies were unjustly beaten. The California police beat them for no just reason because they wanted the Okies to leave the state. The police killed Casey for no just reason. They killed him just becaus e they thought the was a Okie fighting for more rights. The Californians did not like the Okies even though they were Americans, just like how the Blacks were not liked by the whites, even though they were Americans. White mistreatment of African Americans was not the only Americans mistreatment of Americans there was also the infamous Red Scare.The Red Scares is another(prenominal) situation in which Americans mistreated Americans.

Euthanasia Essay: Mercy Killing or Murder? -- Euthanasia Physician Ass

Euthanasia Mercy Killing or Murder? We, as military mans, are mortal beings. Our life yoke is finite. Even though we are mortal, we try to hang onto our lives as large as we can fear of death and wanting to live forever are, aft(prenominal) all, part of human nature. Sometimes, however, the field of medicine capitalizes on this aspect of humanity. While it is sure as shooting true that one goal of medicine has always been to prolong life, another(prenominal) goal has been the alleviation of pain and suffering. One point at which these two views collide is over the hotly debated issue of euthanasia. Euthanasia, or mercy killing, as it has been called, is certainly not an issue with just two sides. There are many shades of gray involved, so to speak. Euthanasia, after all, ranges from simply allowing an individual to die course without life support or pulling the plug (passive euthanasia), all the way to Jack Kevorkians suicide machine (active euthanasia). To complicate thing s further, there is also voluntary euthanasia, Cases in which patient requests to be killed, and dies as a result of action taken by another person, involuntary euthanasia cases in which no action is bespeak because the patient is unconscious, senile, or otherwise incapable of making a request, but the person is allowed to die or is killed, and nonvoluntary euthanasia cases in which a conscious, terminally ill patient states that they do not want to die, but is allowed to die or is killed anyway (http//valdosta.peachnet.edu). While an individual may advocate one regulate of euthanasia, it is not uncommon for the same person to be completely against another form. There are cases in which euthanasia is wrong, especially cases involving conscious pe... ...d dreaded events that human beings ever have to go through. This is probably the main reason that euthanasia is so controversial. It is human nature for us to try and prolong our lives as long as possible, and, through medicine, we have prolonged them quite a bit. It is important to remember, nevertheless, that sometimes while attempting to fight our common enemy death, we lose sight of the trounce interests of the individuals whose lives we are affecting. Are these people not the most qualified people to make this decision? It is, after all, their lives that hang in the balance. Works Cited Murder American Heritage Dictionary on CD-ROM, 1991. Internet Http//www.ieatf.org.McCord, William. Internet Http//valdosta.peachnet.edu. Moral Dilemmas. Society 29 July-August 1992 22. Pallone, Nathaniel. Society 29 July-August 1992 35.

The Failure of Journalism during the Civil War in El Salvador Essay

The Failure of Journalism during the civic War in El SalvadorThe Civil War in El Salvador was an event that most individuals misunderstood. A cardinal year conflict and a power struggle that claimed to keep communism out of El Salvador killed 75,000 people and the whole story still remains untold. The Civil War in El Salvador was a conflict that roughly started in 1980 and ended with the peace accords in 1992. These dates are rough because there were many conflicts ahead 1980 and even after the peace accords were signed in 1992 the death squads 1 were still active every now and again. With respect to United States involvement, the reason the United States was initially involved was to block communist rule from spreading to another country. In hope of preventing this communist spread, the U.S. trained and equipped the Salvadoran military to be very powerful and very dangerous. The reason the U.S. felt the military would stop communism is because leftist groups had begun to or ganize themselves around the guerillas. Due to this separation of power in the war torn country, anyone who supported or even acknowledged the guerillas and the leftist side was given the harshest and most severe punishment, often death. Because of these harsh and hostile conditions the factual story of the leftist side was often skewed. As the regimen in power began to oppress the people, leftist groups formed in opposition to the militant government oppression. When enough leftists had come together they formed what was known as the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (F.M.L.N.), which got a bad reputation from the beginning for having Marxist ideals (Stanley 2), because the United States involvement to keep communism out of Central ... ... truth. 1 The term death squad is a term used for effect. The word itself leads to biases because of the very spirit that the term implies. Terminology like this was just one instance that made reports biased.2 This ignorance wa s an ignorance of the culture as well as the specific details of the war. It is not a requirement that reporters be proficient in the language of the country they are reporting in and so the vagueness of many reports can be somewhat attributed to this scenario. 3 Its front interesting to note that the U.N. truth commission itself seemed to distinguish murders committed by the army and murders committed by the death squads when it is quite clear that the death squads were run under close control of the army.4 Ethnocentricity defined by dictionary.com is the belief in the superiority of ones own ethnic group.

Terrorism Essay: Metaphors for Terror :: September 11 Terrorism Essays

Metaphors for Terror   The administrations framings and reframings and its search for metaphors should be noted. The initial framing was as a crime with victims and perpetrators to be brought to justice and punished. The crime frame entails law, courts, lawyers, trials, sentencing, appeals, and so on. It was hours before crime changed to war with casualties, enemies, military action, war powers, and so on.   Donald Rumsfeld and other administration officials have pointed out that this blank space does not fit our understanding of a war. There are enemies and casualties all right, but no enemy army, no regiments, no tanks, no ships, no nimbus agitate, no battlefields, no strategic targets, and no clear victory. The war frame just doesnt fit. Colin Powell had always argued that no troops should be committed without specific objectives, a clear and achievable definition of victory, a clear exit strategy-and no open-ended commitments. But he has pointed out that none of these is present in this war.   Because the thought of war doesnt fit, there is a frantic search for metaphors. First, Bush called the terrorists cowards-but this didnt seem to work too well for martyrs who willing sacrificed their lives for their moral and religious ideals. More latterly he has spoken of smoking them out of their holes as if they were rodents, and Rumsfeld has spoken of drying up the swamp they live in as if they were snakes or lowly swamp creatures. The abstract metaphors here are Moral Is Up Immoral Is Down (they are lowly) and Immoral People Are Animals (that live close to the ground).   The use of the word barbarous in the administrations discourse works in the following way. In conservative, strict father morality (see Moral Politics, Chapter 5) evil is a palpable thing, a force in the world. To stand up to evil you have to be morally strong. If youre weak, you let evil triumph, so that weakness is a form of evil in itself, as is promoting weakness. Evi l is inherent, an all-important(a) trait, that determines how you will act in the world. Evil people do evil things. No further explanation is necessary. There brook be no social causes of evil, no religious rationale for evil, no reasons or arguments for evil. The enemy of evil is good. If our enemy is evil, we are inherently good. Good is our essential nature and what we do in the battle against evil is good.

Terrorism Essay: Metaphors for Terror :: September 11 Terrorism Essays

Metaphors for Terror   The administrations framings and reframings and its search for metaphors should be noted. The initial framing was as a crime with victims and perpetrators to be brought to legal expert and punished. The crime frame entails law, courts, lawyers, trials, sentencing, appeals, and so on. It was hours before crime changed to contend with casualties, enemies, military action, war powers, and so on.   Donald Rumsfeld and other administration officials have pointed out that this situation does not fit our understanding of a war. T present are enemies and casualties all right, but no enemy army, no regiments, no tanks, no ships, no air force, no battlefields, no strategic targets, and no form victory. The war frame just doesnt fit. Colin Powell had always argued that no troops should be committed without specific objectives, a clear and achievable definition of victory, a clear exit strategy-and no open-ended commitments. But he has pointed out that none of these is present in this war.   Because the concept of war doesnt fit, there is a frantic search for metaphors. First, Bush called the terrorists cowards-but this didnt seem to work too well for martyrs who willing sacrificed their lives for their moral and religious ideals. More recently he has spoken of smoking them out of their holes as if they were rodents, and Rumsfeld has spoken of drying up the swamp they live in as if they were snakes or lowly swamp creatures. The conceptual metaphors here are Moral Is Up Immoral Is Down (they are lowly) and Immoral People Are Animals (that live close to the ground).   The use of the word evil in the administrations discourse works in the following way. In conservative, strict father morality (see Moral Politics, Chapter 5) evil is a palpable thing, a force in the world. To stand up to evil you have to be morally strong. If youre weak, you let evil triumph, so that weakness is a form of evil in itself, as is promoting weakness. Evil is inherent, an essential trait, that determines how you will act in the world. Evil people do evil things. No further explanation is necessary. There can be no social causes of evil, no religious rationale for evil, no reasons or arguments for evil. The enemy of evil is good. If our enemy is evil, we are inherently good. Good is our essential disposition and what we do in the battle against evil is good.